Heather, your evaluation is disjointed and limited. It needs to be far more detailed, critical and evaluative.
Q1. This is very short for what I would have expected to be the most detailed part of your evaluation. You need to offer a detailed analysis of each text in terms of their generic and technical conventions - camera, editing, mise-en-scene, sound, semiotics, typography, layout... You also need to draw on theory/arguments related to genre.
Q2. This was answered a little better but still lacked the depth I hoped for. You need to be critical.
Q3. Your response to audience feedback is also limited. You need to engage 'evaluatively' with both your own feelings about your finished work in comparison with the feedback you received.
Heather, your evaluation is disjointed and limited. It needs to be far more detailed, critical and evaluative.
ReplyDeleteQ1. This is very short for what I would have expected to be the most detailed part of your evaluation. You need to offer a detailed analysis of each text in terms of their generic and technical conventions - camera, editing, mise-en-scene, sound, semiotics, typography, layout... You also need to draw on theory/arguments related to genre.
Q2. This was answered a little better but still lacked the depth I hoped for. You need to be critical.
Q3. Your response to audience feedback is also limited. You need to engage 'evaluatively' with both your own feelings about your finished work in comparison with the feedback you received.
Q4. This is thorough.
Your blog is excellent.
Also, in Q1, you ned to consider Postmodernism. There is a clear link between MV and PM, as you well know. :-)
Delete